COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
|
Question
[CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
|
|
|
They are not effective
|
|
|
They do not explore combinations of input circumstances
|
|
|
They explore combinations of input circumstances
|
|
|
None of the above
|
Detailed explanation-1: -they do not explore combinations of input circumstances. they do not explore combinations of input circumstances. they are not effective.
Detailed explanation-2: -Disadvantages of boundary value analysis Hence, incorrect identification of equivalence classes leads to incorrect boundary value testing. Applications with open boundaries or applications not having one-dimensional boundaries are not suitable for this technique.
Detailed explanation-3: -Boundary Value Analysis is better than Equivalence Partitioning as it considers both positive and negative values along with maximum and minimum value. So, when compared with Equivalence Partitioning, Boundary Value Analysis proves to be a better choice in assuring the quality.
Detailed explanation-4: -Limitations of BVA: 1) Boolean and logical variables present a problem for Boundary Value Analysis. 2) BVA assumes the variables to be truly independent which is not always possible. 3) BVA test cases have been found to be rudimentary because they are obtained with very little insight and imagination.