Which of the following High Country say adult son has no legal right to live in his parents house.

2016

Please wait while the activity loads.
If this activity does not load, try refreshing your browser. Also, this page requires javascript. Please visit using a browser with javascript enabled.

If loading fails, click here to try again

Question [CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]

Which of the following High Country say adult son has no legal right to live in his parent’s house.

A	High Court of Gujarat
B	High Court of Maharashtra
C	High Court of Delhi
D	High Court of Goa

Explanation:

Detailed explanation-1: -A son cannot have a right, title or interest in the flats owned by his parents as long as they are live, the Bombay High Court held on Thursday [Sonia Fazal Khan & Ors v. Union of India & Ors]. Want to read the full story?

Detailed explanation-2: -A son also holds a right to file a partition suit for his rightful share in the property and can ask for the same during the lifetime of his father. Moreover, he can sell his share in the ancestral property to any third person even before the formal partition of the property has taken place.

Detailed explanation-3: -Legal rights of a son on father’s property in India The son is treated as a Class I heir of his father’s property. He has a legal right over his father’s ancestral property. He also has an equal share in his father’s self-acquired property if the father dies intestate.

Detailed explanation-4: -There is no legal procedure to leave the house of your parents. After attaining majority you are free to leave them and reside at a place of your will. Police has no authority under any law to take you back to your parents upon attaining age of majority i.e. 18 years.

There is 1 question to complete.