FUNDAMENTALS OF COMPUTER

Detailed explanation-1: -No. Open Source Software certainly does have the potential to be more secure than its closed source counterpart. But make no mistake, simply being open source is no guarantee of security.

Detailed explanation-2: -Open systems aren’t inherently less secure than their proprietary counterparts, and open source code is not inherently less secure than proprietary code. Instead, Open Source Software (OSS) poses familiar cybersecurity challenges. Despite this, focusing on the security of OSS is broadly beneficial.

Detailed explanation-3: -Due to the large number of individuals contributing to an open-source project and ultimately improving the software, proponents of open source systems assert fewer vulnerabilities and faster patching. In contrast, closed-source proponents argue that their codebases are more secure and less vulnerable to hacking.

Detailed explanation-4: -Open-source software does have vulnerabilities, just the same as proprietary or closed-source software. Software vendors within both paradigms are equally beholden to keeping on top of the vulnerability reports, issue patches and fixes, and keeping their users safe.

Detailed explanation-5: -Open source is generally much more cost-effective than a proprietary solution. Not only are open source solutions typically much more inexpensive in an enterprise environment for equivalent or superior capability, but they also give enterprises the ability to start small and scale (more on that coming up).