INTERRUPT PROGRAMMING
ARCHITECTURE OF 8085
|
Question
[CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
|
Interpreter takes less memory than compiler
|
|
True
|
|
|
False
|
|
|
Either A or B
|
|
|
None of the above
|
Explanation:
Detailed explanation-1: -A: If the process is considered, the Interpreter is faster than the compiler. However, once a program is compiled, Runtime or execution is faster for a compiled program over-interpreted ones.
Detailed explanation-2: -A compiler takes a lot of time to analyze the source code. However, the overall time taken to execute the process is much faster. An interpreter does not generate an intermediary code. Hence, an interpreter is highly efficient in terms of its memory.
Detailed explanation-3: -A Compiler takes a program as a whole. An Interpreter takes single lines of a code. The Compilers generate intermediate machine codes. The Interpreters never generate any intermediate machine codes.
There is 1 question to complete.