AMERICAN IMPERIALISM 1890 1919
AMERICAN IMPERIALISM
|
Question
[CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
|
|
|
upheld the conviction of Schenck for sending mailbombs to key political figures
|
|
|
struck down and and all federal restrictions of free speech imposed before the war
|
|
|
overturned Shenck’s conviction, allowed him to keep publishing his pamphlet
|
|
|
ruled against Schenck, citing the need to limit free speech that poses a “clear & present danger"
|
Detailed explanation-1: -The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Detailed explanation-2: -United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919) If speech is intended to result in a crime, and there is a clear and present danger that it actually will result in a crime, the First Amendment does not protect the speaker from government action.
Detailed explanation-3: -The Court ruled that freedom of speech and freedom of the press under the First Amendment could be limited only if the words in the circumstances created “a clear and present danger.” Bluebook Citation: Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919).
Detailed explanation-4: -United States, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on March 3, 1919, that the freedom of speech protection afforded in the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented to society a “clear and present danger.”