AMERICAN IMPERIALISM 1890 1919
THE UNITED STATES IN WORLD WAR I
|
Question
[CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
|
|
|
The Sedition Act was unconsitutional
|
|
|
The right to bear arms could be limited for immigrants
|
|
|
Freedom of speech could be curbed in wartime
|
|
|
Immigrants from countries at war with the U.S. could be excluded from positions of power
|
Detailed explanation-1: -United States, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on March 3, 1919, that the freedom of speech protection afforded in the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented to society a “clear and present danger .”
Detailed explanation-2: -United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919) If speech is intended to result in a crime, and there is a clear and present danger that it actually will result in a crime, the First Amendment does not protect the speaker from government action.
Detailed explanation-3: -In the landmark Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919), the Supreme Court affirmed the conviction of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer for violating the Espionage Act of 1917 through actions that obstructed the “recruiting or enlistment service” during World War I.
Detailed explanation-4: -The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order.
Detailed explanation-5: -The Court held that the Espionage Act did not violate the First Amendment and was an appropriate exercise of Congress’ wartime authority.