USA HISTORY

Detailed explanation-1: -The Supreme Court’s refusal to acknowledge jurisdiction in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia meant that the Cherokee Nation did not have legal recourse against Georgia laws that sought to force them off their land. The Cherokee Nation did not give up and attempted to sue again in Worcester v. Georgia (1832).

Detailed explanation-2: -Impact and Legacy Georgia, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Nation was sovereign. According to the decision rendered by Chief Justice John Marshall, this meant that Georgia had no rights to enforce state laws in its territory.

Detailed explanation-3: -On review of the case, the Supreme Court in Worcester v. Georgia ruled that because the Cherokee Nation was a separate political entity that could not be regulated by the state, Georgia’s license law was unconstitutional and Worcester’s conviction should be overturned.

Detailed explanation-4: -Worcester claimed Georgia’s action was unconstitutional based on three arguments: Georgia had violated federal treaties; impaired the obligation of contracts between the United States and the Cherokee; and interfered with the federal power to regulate commerce with Indians. Worcester was a “win” for the Cherokee.

Detailed explanation-5: -In the first, Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831), the Court decided that the Natives were a “domestic dependent nation, ” while in the second, Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the Court decided that they were “distinct, independent political communities.”