JACKSONIAN DEMOCRACY 1825 1850
PRESIDENT ANDREW JACKSON
|
Question
[CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
|
|
|
differing views concerning the doctrine of nullification.
|
|
|
differing view about South Carolina’s secession from the Union
|
|
|
differing views on the Indian Removal Act
|
|
|
differing views on the Second Bank of the US
|
Detailed explanation-1: -The Webster–Hayne debate was a debate in the United States between Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Senator Robert Y. Hayne of South Carolina that took place on January 19–27, 1830 on the topic of protectionist tariffs.
Detailed explanation-2: -Many Southerners, in response to tariff laws that favored the North, supported the concept of “nullification.” Nullification held that states had the right to disobey laws of Congress they thought were unconstitutional. Webster argued that nullification would destroy the Union.
Detailed explanation-3: -The Webster-Hayne debate was a series of spontaneous speeches delivered before the Senate in 1830. In this moment in American history, the federal government had relatively little power. State governments were in control of their own affairs and expected little intervention from the federal government.
Detailed explanation-4: -Daniel Webster, senator from Massachusetts (in favor of tariffs), debated the issue of tariffs with Robert Y. Hayne, senator from South Carolina (against tariffs), in 1830.