USA HISTORY

MAKING OF A NEW NATION 1776 1800

THE BILL OF RIGHTS THE CONSTITUTIONS FIRST 10 AMENDMENTS

Question [CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
SS.7.C.3.12Which statement describes the significance of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda v. Arizona?
A
Southern states could no longer maintain racially segregatesd public schools.
B
States could no longer have racial quotas as part of their affirmativce action programs.
C
Individuals accused of serious crimes unable to pay for an attorney were entitled to a state-sponsored one.
D
Suspects had to be told of their right to have an attorney present or to remain silent during police interrogations.
Explanation: 

Detailed explanation-1: -In a 5-4 Supreme Court decision Miranda v. Arizona (1966) ruled that an arrested individual is entitled to rights against self-discrimination and to an attorney under the 5th and 6th Amendments of the United States Constitution.

Detailed explanation-2: -Miranda never was told of his right to remain silent, of his right to have a lawyer, or of the fact that any of his statements during the interrogation could be used against him in court.

Detailed explanation-3: -At trial, the oral and written confessions were presented to the jury. Miranda was found guilty of kidnapping and rape and was sentenced to 20-30 years imprisonment on each count. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda’s constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession.

There is 1 question to complete.