THE 1970S 1969 1979
SUPREME COURT CASE ROE V WADE
|
Question
[CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
|
|
|
California v Bakke
|
|
|
Roe V Wade
|
|
|
Escobedo v Illinois
|
|
|
Plessy v Ferguson
|
Detailed explanation-1: -Escobedo v. Illinois established that criminal suspects have a right to counsel not just at trial but during police interrogations. The ACLU of Illinois argued the case before the Supreme Court, citing the police’s own textbooks on how to conduct aggressive interrogations.
Detailed explanation-2: -As soon as someone is in the custody of law enforcement, he or she has a Sixth Amendment right to speak to an attorney. In a 5-4 decision authored by Justice Goldberg, the Court ruled that Escobedo’s Sixth Amendment rights had been violated.
Detailed explanation-3: -United States, the U.S. Supreme Court rules in Escobedo v. Illinois that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel applies to interrogations of suspects before they have been charged with any particular crime.
Detailed explanation-4: -In Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387 (1977), the Supreme Court held that a defendant gains the right to an attorney “at or after the time that judicial proceedings have been initiated against him, whether by formal charge, preliminary hearing, indictment, information, or arraignment."