THE 1970S 1969 1979
SUPREME COURT CASE ROE V WADE
|
Question
[CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
|
As a result of the Supreme Court ruling in Miranda v. Arizona, a person accused of a crime is entitled to
|
|
a speedy trial
|
|
|
reasonable bail
|
|
|
a reading of his or her rights at the time of arrest
|
|
|
protection against cruel and unusual punishment
|
Explanation:
Detailed explanation-1: -In a 5-4 Supreme Court decision Miranda v. Arizona (1966) ruled that an arrested individual is entitled to rights against self-discrimination and to an attorney under the 5th and 6th Amendments of the United States Constitution.
Detailed explanation-2: -In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
Detailed explanation-3: -Miranda never was told of his right to remain silent, of his right to have a lawyer, or of the fact that any of his statements during the interrogation could be used against him in court.
There is 1 question to complete.