THE 1970S 1969 1979
SUPREME COURT CASE ROE V WADE
|
Question
[CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
|
|
|
Mapp v. Ohio
|
|
|
Gideon v. Wainwright
|
|
|
Reynolds v. Sims
|
|
|
National Labor Relations Board v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corp.
|
Detailed explanation-1: -CHIEF JUSTICE HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court. In a proceeding under the National Labor Relations Act of 1935, [Footnote 1] the National Labor Relations Board found that the respondent, Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, had violated the Act by engaging in unfair labor practices affecting commerce.
Detailed explanation-2: -The case arose after the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ordered Jones & Laughlin Steel to rehire workers who had been fired for seeking to unionize. Jones and Laughlin refused to comply on the grounds that the Wagner Act, which had established the NLRB, was unconstitutional.
Detailed explanation-3: -Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation is a case decided on April 12, 1937, by the United States Supreme Court that interpreted the Commerce Clause to give Congress authority over intrastate activities if they were substantially related to interstate commerce.
Detailed explanation-4: -Summary. NLRB v Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation was a U.S. Supreme Court case that brought into question the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act of 1935. The court ruled in favor of the NLRB with claims that Commerce Clause allowed the government to regulate interstate commerce.