THE 1970S 1969 1979
SUPREME COURT CASE ROE V WADE
|
Question
[CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
|
|
|
Texas v. Johnson
|
|
|
In Re Gault
|
|
|
Gideon v. Wainwright
|
|
|
Miranda v. Arizona
|
Detailed explanation-1: -In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that juvenile criminal defendants are entitled to Due Process protection under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Detailed explanation-2: -8–1 decision for Gault The proceedings of the Juvenile Court failed to comply with the Constitution. The Court held that the proceedings for juveniles had to comply with the requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Detailed explanation-3: -The lack of formal process and constitutional due process in the juvenile justice system – and potential for substantial deprivations of children’s liberty through extensive periods of incarceration even in juvenile facilities-came to light in the landmark 1967 U.S. Supreme Court decision In re Gault.