THE 1970S 1969 1979
SUPREME COURT CASE ROE V WADE
Question
[CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
|
|
Chisholm v. Georgia
|
|
Roe v. Wade
|
|
Schenck v. U.S.
|
|
Mapp v. Ohio
|
Detailed explanation-1: -The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Detailed explanation-2: -Decision: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 5-3 vote in favor of Mapp. The high court said evidence seized unlawfully, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.
Detailed explanation-3: -United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) It is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment to conduct a search and seizure without a warrant anywhere that a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, unless certain exceptions apply.
Detailed explanation-4: -1/Mapp v. Ohio, ——-367 U.S. 643 (1961), applied the exclusion-ary rule to the States as a matter of Federal constitu-tional law.