This court case alleged that the voting districts as drawn in Texas contained impermissible deviations from population equality and that the plans multi-member districts were constitutionally invalid because they diluted the voting strength of racial and ethnic minorities.

SUPREME COURT CASE ROE V WADE

Please wait while the activity loads.
If this activity does not load, try refreshing your browser. Also, this page requires javascript. Please visit using a browser with javascript enabled.

If loading fails, click here to try again

Question [CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]

This court case alleged that the voting districts as drawn in Texas contained impermissible deviations from population equality and that the plan’s multi-member districts were constitutionally invalid because they diluted the voting strength of racial and ethnic minorities.

A	Edgewood ISD v. Kirby
B	Hernandez v. Texas
C	Wisconsin v. Yoder
D	White v. Regester

Explanation:

Detailed explanation-1: -The landmark case of White v. Regester challenged the constitutionality of a 1964 Supreme Court decision requiring the redrawing of state districts to make them all of roughly equal population size.

There is 1 question to complete.

USA HISTORY

THE 1970S 1969 1979

SUPREME COURT CASE ROE V WADE