THE 1970S 1969 1979
SUPREME COURT CASE ROE V WADE
|
Question
[CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
|
This ruling gave a school district had the constitutional authority to limit a student’s (Frasier) speech because of the educational authority that is given to schools by the tenth amendment.
|
|
Brown vs Board of Education
|
|
|
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier
|
|
|
Bethel School District vs Frasier
|
|
|
Mapp v. Ohio
|
Explanation:
Detailed explanation-1: -Fraser for delivering a speech laced with sexual references before a student assembly. Fraser’s speech, nominating a classmate to a student elective office, referred to the student as “firm in his pants, ” who would take it to “the climax.” After school officials suspended Fraser, he sued in federal court.
Detailed explanation-2: -Since the speech in question was not political, as it was in Tinker, it was entitled to a lower level of protection. Schools have the responsibility of instructing students in what constitutes socially appropriate behavior and speech, so they have the right to punish inappropriate speech.
There is 1 question to complete.