THE 1970S 1969 1979
SUPREME COURT CASE ROE V WADE
|
Question
[CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
|
|
|
Furman v. Georgia, 1972
|
|
|
Gregg v. Georgia
|
|
|
Escobedo v. Illinois
|
|
|
None of the above
|
Detailed explanation-1: -Escobedo v. Illinois established that criminal suspects have a right to counsel not just at trial but during police interrogations. The ACLU of Illinois argued the case before the Supreme Court, citing the police’s own textbooks on how to conduct aggressive interrogations.
Detailed explanation-2: -United States, the U.S. Supreme Court rules in Escobedo v. Illinois that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel applies to interrogations of suspects before they have been charged with any particular crime.
Detailed explanation-3: -Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment.
Detailed explanation-4: -In Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) and Miranda v. Arizona (q.v.), (1966), the Supreme Court required that the police inform a suspected person of his right to remain silent and of his right to have legal counsel present at his interrogation.