THE 1970S 1969 1979
SUPREME COURT CASE ROE V WADE
|
Question
[CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
|
|
|
Schenck v. U.S.
|
|
|
Mendez v. Westminster
|
|
|
White v. Regester
|
|
|
Edgewood v. Kirby
|
Detailed explanation-1: -United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919) If speech is intended to result in a crime, and there is a clear and present danger that it actually will result in a crime, the First Amendment does not protect the speaker from government action.
Detailed explanation-2: -In Schenck v. United States (1919), the Supreme Court invented the famous “clear and present danger” test to determine when a state could constitutionally limit an individual’s free speech rights under the First Amendment.
Detailed explanation-3: -Dennis (1950): “Clear and present danger depends upon whether the mischief of the repression is greater than the gravity of the evil, discounted by its improbability.” Vinson embraced this rephrasing when Dennis was appealed to the Supreme Court in Dennis v. United States (1951).
Detailed explanation-4: -Abrams v. United States (1919) is similar to the case of Schenck v. United States (1919). Jacob Abrams was convicted of violating the Espionage Act for publishing materials advocating a general strike, something that would diminish weapon production for the War.