THE 1970S 1969 1979
SUPREME COURT CASE ROE V WADE
|
Question
[CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
|
|
|
That a judge acts on what the constitution says word for work (strict meaning of the constitution)
|
|
|
That a judge acts on interpreting loosely what the constitution (a loose meaning) says
|
|
|
Either A or B
|
|
|
None of the above
|
Detailed explanation-1: -Judicial activism describes judicial rulings suspected of being based on personal or political considerations rather than on existing law. Sometimes judges appear to exceed their power in deciding cases before the Court. They are supposed to exercise judgment in interpreting the law, according to the Constitution.
Detailed explanation-2: -What is judicial activism? Judicial activism is the exercise of the power of judicial review to set aside government acts. Generally, the phrase is used to identify undesirable exercises of that power, but there is little agreement on which instances are undesirable.
Detailed explanation-3: -Judicial activism is a judicial philosophy holding that the courts can and should go beyond the applicable law to consider broader societal implications of its decisions. It is sometimes used as an antonym of judicial restraint.
Detailed explanation-4: -The active role of the judiciary in upholding the rights of citizens and preserving the constitutional and legal system of the country is known as judicial activism.
Detailed explanation-5: -Judicial activism is the practice of using the courts’ authority to examine state actions. According to Articles 32 and 226 of the Indian Constitution, the higher judiciary has the power to consider any legislative, executive, or administrative action as unconstitutional and void if it does so.