USA HISTORY

THE 1970S 1969 1979

SUPREME COURT CASE ROE V WADE

Question [CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
Which court case stated that suspects must be read their rights when arrested or anything said is inadmissible in court.
A
Plessy v Ferguson
B
Texas v Johnson
C
Tinker v Des Moines
D
Miranda v. Arizona
Explanation: 

Detailed explanation-1: -In a 5-4 Supreme Court decision Miranda v. Arizona (1966) ruled that an arrested individual is entitled to rights against self-discrimination and to an attorney under the 5th and 6th Amendments of the United States Constitution.

Detailed explanation-2: -The Miranda Rights derive their name from the Supreme Court Case Miranda v. Arizona, which established the requirement of police to “read you your rights” after an arrest and before questioning you.

Detailed explanation-3: -This provision became embedded in the public consciousness following the Supreme Court’s 1966 ruling in Miranda v. Arizona, whereby suspects were required to be informed of their most important rights, including the right against self-incrimination, before being interrogated in police custody.

Detailed explanation-4: -The Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda v. Arizona addressed four different cases involving custodial interrogations. In each of these cases, the defendant was questioned by police officers, detectives, or a prosecuting attorney in a room in which he was cut off from the outside world.

There is 1 question to complete.