THE 1970S 1969 1979
SUPREME COURT CASE ROE V WADE
|
Question
[CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
|
|
|
Freedom of Expression
|
|
|
Freedom of Speech
|
|
|
Self-incrimination
|
|
|
Right to counsel
|
Detailed explanation-1: -The Court held that “there can be no doubt that the Fifth Amendment privilege is available outside of criminal court proceedings and serves to protect persons in all settings in which their freedom of action is curtailed in any significant way from being compelled to incriminate themselves.”
Detailed explanation-2: -In a 5-4 Supreme Court decision Miranda v. Arizona (1966) ruled that an arrested individual is entitled to rights against self-discrimination and to an attorney under the 5th and 6th Amendments of the United States Constitution.
Detailed explanation-3: -In the 1966 Supreme Court decision Miranda. V Arizona, the court held that before the police can obtain statements from a person subjected to an interrogation, the person must be given a Miranda warning.
Detailed explanation-4: -The Miranda rights are established Arizona, establishing the principle that all criminal suspects must be advised of their rights before interrogation. Now considered standard police procedure, “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can, and will, be used against you in court of law.