USA HISTORY

THE VIRGINIA DYNASTY 1801 1825

HENRY CLAY

Question [CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
ruling claims a state law cannot interfere with federal law. It confirms right of Congress to set up National Bank under the elastic clause.
A
Worcester v Georgia
B
Marbury v. Madison
C
McCulloch v. Maryland
D
Gibbons v Ogden
Explanation: 

Detailed explanation-1: -Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819) States cannot interfere with the federal government when it uses its implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause to further its express constitutional powers. The U.S. Congress created the Second Bank of the United States in 1816.

Detailed explanation-2: -The court decided that the Federal Government had the right and power to set up a Federal bank and that states did not have the power to tax the Federal Government. Marshall ruled in favor of the Federal Government and concluded, “the power to tax involves the power to destroy."

Detailed explanation-3: -For McCulloch v. Maryland, there were two questions the Court was trying to answer: Did Congress have the authority to establish the bank under the Constitution? Did the Maryland law unconstitutionally interfere with congressional powers?

Detailed explanation-4: -McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) is one of the most important Supreme Court cases regarding federal power. In a unanimous decision, the Court established that Congress had implied constitutional power to create a national bank and that individual states could not tax a federally chartered bank.

There is 1 question to complete.