GK
INDIAN HISTORY
|
Question
[CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]
|
|
|
Simon Commission recommended the abolition of Dyarchy (Diarchy) in the Provinces
|
|
|
there was no Indian member in the Simon Commission
|
|
|
Indians never wanted the review of the working of the Act of 1919
|
|
|
the Simon Commission suggested the partition of the country
|
Detailed explanation-1: -Thus the Indian statutory commission popularly known as the Simon Commission was appointed in 1927. However, as no Indian was on the committee it was met with boycott unanimously throughout India by all parties. The Muslim league was split on this but Jinnah carried the majority with him in favour of the boycott.
Detailed explanation-2: -The Indians rejected the Simon Commission because it did not have any Indian members. Q. Why was the Simon Commission rejected by the Congress?
Detailed explanation-3: -Answers. The Simon Commission was opposed primarily because it did not have any Indian representation in the assemblage. The government of Britain had appointed this Commission in 1927. The goal of the Simon Commission was to give an account of how the Indian constitution was working.
Detailed explanation-4: -The Commission arrived in 1928, but it was boycotted by the Indians as the commission did not have any Indian representative.