GENERAL KNOWLEDGE

GK

INDIAN POLITICS

Please wait while the activity loads.
If this activity does not load, try refreshing your browser. Also, this page requires javascript. Please visit using a browser with javascript enabled.

If loading fails, click here to try again

Question [CLICK ON ANY CHOICE TO KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER]

In which case did the Supreme Court take the view that the Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles are complementary to each other and there was no need to sacrifice one for the other?

A	Golak Nath Case
B	Keshavananda Bharati Case
C	Minerva Mills Case
D	All of the above

Explanation:

Detailed explanation-1: -After the Minerva Mills Case, The supreme court to the view that there is no conflict between the Fundamental Rights and the DPSP and they were complimentary of each other.

Detailed explanation-2: -Shankari Prasad v. Main Theme: In this case, the constitutional validity of the First Amendment Act (1951), was challenged. The Supreme Court ruled that the power of the Parliament to amend the Constitution under Article 368 also includes the power to amend Fundamental Rights.

Detailed explanation-3: -The name of Champakam Dorairajan Case (1951) is associated with the first amendment in the constitution of India. It is a landmark decision that solved a conflict between fundamental rights and directive principles of state policies.

There is 1 question to complete.