BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Detailed explanation-1: -The plaintiff must have sufficient cause to believe that he would be harmed if he attempted to leave that particular bounded area. However, if that individual remains in that area willingly or after giving his own consent, not obtained through coercion or undue influence, it is not a case of false imprisonment.

Detailed explanation-2: -Normally the tort of false imprisonment must be intentional. A person is not liable for false imprisonment unless his or her act is done for the purpose of imposing a confinement or with knowledge that such a confinement, to a substantial certainty will result from it. Malice is irrelevant to this tort.

Detailed explanation-3: -The tort of false imprisonment must be intentional. A person is liable for false imprisonment when their act is done for the purpose of restricting/confining someone or with the knowledge that such confinement, to a high certainty, will result from it. False imprisonment or restraint must be willful.

Detailed explanation-4: -Even negligent acts causes this tort of false imprisonment for example if a person locks someone inside a room without unaware of the fact that there is someone in the room than he is held liable for false imprisonment.