BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Detailed explanation-1: -Actual confusion occurs when a person, as a result of the similarity of the parties’ marks, mistakenly believes that an alleged infringer’s goods or services are the plaintiff’s goods or services, or are affiliated with or approved by the plaintiff.

Detailed explanation-2: -A trade mark is likely to deceive or cause confusion by its resemblance to another mark if it is likely to do so in the course of its legitimate use in a market the two marks are assumed to be in use by traders in that market. In considering the matter, all the circumstances of the case must be considered.

Detailed explanation-3: -An example of confusingly similar in trademark law is when a symbol or logo is so exceedingly similar to an existing trademark that the public might mistake the symbol with the existing one.

Detailed explanation-4: -Any person who–(a) falsifies any trade mark; or. (b) falsely applies to goods or services any trade mark; or. (c) makes, disposes of, or has in his possession, any die, block, machine, plate or other instrument for the purpose of falsifying or of being used for falsifying, a trade mark; or.