AP PSYCHOLOGY

Detailed explanation-1: -Which of the following activities is inconsistent with drive-reduction theory? Eating food when you are not hungry is an activity that is inconsistent with the drive-reduction theory. As per drive-reduction theory, a need is a state of deprivation that leads to a drive.

Detailed explanation-2: -According to drive-reduction theory, organisms seek food when they experience the drive of hunger. Any behaviour that reduces the drive is likely to be repeated by both humans and animals, so this is why they continue to eat.

Detailed explanation-3: -This theory failed to explain why some people are driven to increase the stimulation rather than decrease them. Some people engage in a behavior despite the lack of need to reduce or satisfy a drive, such as eating desserts despite being full.

Detailed explanation-4: -In drive. psychologist Clark Hull proposed a drive-reduction theory of learning. In its simplest form, the theory claimed that no learning occurred unless a drive produced tension and impelled the organism into activity to procure a reward that would reduce the drive and satisfy its related physiological need.

Detailed explanation-5: -The primary drive of hunger is explained through the theory of Drive-Reduction. This theory posits that biological urges motivate humans to behave or act in a manner which satisfies the urge. As such, a drive such as hunger will create tension or an urge that causes the person to eat in order to satisfy the hunger.